home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0
/
Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0 (L0pht Heavy Industries, Inc.)(1997).ISO
/
tezcat
/
Education
/
Parent_Monitoring.txt
< prev
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-07-08
|
6KB
|
144 lines
From the Radio Free Michigan archives
ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot
If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to
bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu.
------------------------------------------------
'BIG BROTHER' AFTER MOM AND DAD
EXPERTS SEEK LICENSE TO MONITOR PARENTS
=======================================
By Don Feder of HUMAN EVENTS
Jack C. Westman, you are one scary dude. A professor of
psychiatry at the University of Wisconsin, Westman would
be Dr. Death for the American family if his prescription
for licensing parents is adopted.
In his new book, LICENSING PARENTS: CAN WE PREVENT CHILD
ABUSE AND NEGLECT?, Westman declares what others in the
child abuse industry have only intimated: Parenthood is
a priviledge, not a right.
After sighting the usual inflated statistics of childhood
trauma, Westman bemoans the fact that today any man and
woman can procreate without demonstrating the "minimal
competence" needed to get a driver's license.
Aside: Why do liberals assume that state certification is
a quality control? Only 40,000 highway fatalities and
several million collisions a year demonstrate government's
inability to weed out automotive incompetents and motorized
maniacs.
Back to Westman's pernicious proposal, implementation of
which "won't compromise the right of each woman and man to
conceive and each woman to give birth," he assures us.
That assurance is contradicted several chapters later when
basic qualifications for parenting are promulgated. These
include an age requirement and a promise to support and
care for the child.
"The third, possibly optional [note how slyly this is
slipped in], criterion would be completion of a parenting
course or its equivalent." Here, presumably stupid middle-
class parents would be disabused of their prejudices and
indoctrinated in the latest parenting techniques of academic
theorists.
The license could be revoked at any time, not in a criminal
but a civil proceeding. Instead of the state being compelled
to prove abuse or neglect, families would be required to
demonstrate a threshold level of "parental fitness."
SLAPPING HER CHILD GETS MOM ARRESTED
Just how insidiously this might work can be seen in the Kivi
case. In July, Georgia resident Lynn Kivi was arrested when
a store clerk reported that she slapped her bratty nine-year-
old in the mouth. The child confessed he had it coming.
Other than a momentary sting, there were no ill effects.
Still, after admitting that she struck her son, the 35-year-
old woman was arrested, handcuffed and charged with a felony
(cruelty to children) that could have resulted in a 20-year
prison term. On realizing the absurdity of the situation,
the authorities dropped all charges.
Under Westman's parent licensing law, the state would be
relieved of the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
After creating a suspicion in the minds of administrators,
Kivi would be compelled to demonstrate parental competence.
Her children could be seized and farmed out to foster care.
Then again, her family might be subjected to such modest
intervention as home visitation - regular supervision by
teams of officious social workers over months or years.
Having been bombarded with tales of all-too-real tragedies,
the public thinks it knows what experts mean by "abuse."
For these innocents, Dana Mack's article - "Are Parents
Bad for Children?" - in the March issue of COMMENTARY is
required reading. Mack points to the ever-expanding
definition of abuse and neglect in books like TOXIC PARENTS
and WHEN PARENTS LOVE TOO MUCH.
Besides life-threatening beatings, according to the experts,
child abuse can include spankings, too many breakfasts at
McDonald's, restricting TV viewing, constant scolding, with-
holding affection and too much affection (thought to foster
dependence).
SPANKING CHILDREN BECOMES 'ASSAULT'
As for physical punishment as mild as a swat on the behind,
James Garbarino, of the Erickson Institute for Advanced
Study in Child Development, insists: "Assault is what it is.
Let's not call it discipline." Perhaps Garbarino will be one
of the eminent authorities called on to devise the criteria
for parent licensing.
Professionals believe most families are sick and in urgent
need of therapy. Mack quotes an article in a popular parents'
magazine that advises: "If we live in America in 1992, we
are more than likely the product of a dysfunctional family
system, carrying our pain into our new family."
Interventionists have some powerful allies in the Clinton
Administration. Atty. Gen. Janet Reno - described by her
hometown newspaper as "part crime fighter, part social
worker" - says it's up to the federal government to make
sure families are "taught parenting skills."
Westman's scheme will find a receptive audience among the
legion of social planners, child-protection bureaucrats
and politicians eager to mount a final assault on the
ultimate bastion of freedom. G. K. Chesterton observed
that the family is "the only check on the state that is
bound to renew itself as eternally as the state, and
more naturally than the state."
Parent licensing is a mandate for government to regulate,
manipulate and ultimately eradicate our best hope for
preserving decency and liberty.
Source: Human Events
Dec. 2, 1994
------------------------------------------------
(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the
Radio Free Michigan archives by the archive maintainer.
All files are ZIP archives for fast download.
E-mail bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu)
Other sites are invited to mirror these files, with attribution to RFM.